Showing posts with label Michigan Attorney General. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michigan Attorney General. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

You Have a Right to Know: FOIA and DWSD



Citizens have the right to know what their government is up to.  That includes the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department.  Michigan Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests can be directed to:


LaTanya Whitfield
Office of the General Counsel
City of Detroit-Water and Sewerage Department
735 Randolph Street
Detroit, MI 48226
Office: 313-964-9034
Fax: 313-842-6510
Email: whitfiel@dwsd.org


State and federal FOIA inquiries have a better chance of success when the request begins on an informed and rational footing.  If new to the process, it helps immensely to read a summary of the statute.  


In Michigan, the Attorney General’s office has posted a summary online. http://www.michigan.gov/documents/ag/FOIA_Pamphlet_380084_7.pdf   
In other states, a Google search or a stop at your local library should produce a useful document. To understand the federal FOIA process, a good place to start is http://www.foia.gov/  -- or your public or school library.
Before you embark on the formal FOIA process, you may be able to save time by making your request informally, either in person or by phone. Can’t hurt to try. And remember, you don’t have to give a reason why you want a particular record.


Although simplicity of application is usually a stated goal of FOIA legislation, you should take that ideal with a grain of salt.  Be as explicit about the subject of your inquiry as you can.  Details specifying who, where, what, why, when and how should be considered, but don’t overdo it.  Erroneous or superfluous details might throw the government searcher off the track.  Look for examples of successful FOIA request letters. Revise them to suit your circumstances.


I can’t emphasize too much the importance of staying on an even keel. Pursuing a FOIA disclosure while angry or frustrated can be self-defeating.  The same is true of self-righteousness and indignation.


Give careful consideration to suggestions that may improve your chances of success.  If things don’t go as well or as fast as expected, press for explanations (preferably in writing), but don’t assume that you’re being ignored or misled intentionally or that there is a conspiracy against you.   


The older the information you’re seeking, the longer it may take to recover it, especially if it predates digital storage.  (Indeed, agencies are authorized in some instances to destroy records after a specified period.)


Similar considerations apply to the quantity requested.  The more you ask for, the longer it is likely to take to assemble (and the more it’s going to cost).  Also, if you’ve made some false assumptions about the pertinence of records you seek, you could end up being charged for useless results.


Consider requesting records in smaller, separate batches, one at a time; for example, by calendar quarters instead of years.  This will prevent going too far down the wrong path.  A variation of this approach is to have a group of friends, associates or classmates each make a small request on your behalf.  It may save money, too, because some government agencies don’t charge for small orders.  


Remember, too, you probably have the option to view the requested materials and copy them yourself at a specified agency office.  Usually, this can be done at less cost or even for free.


A denial of your request, in whole or part, generally triggers a right to an administrative appeal, followed by court review, if so desired.  The term “denial” embraces a number of different circumstances, some explicit, some not.  It’s important to learn the various meanings.


Keep in mind the possibility that the information you seek may be found in other places, public or private.  In this day and age, for example, given the interaction between local, state and federal agencies, information originating at one level may very well have been sent to agencies at other levels, all subject to FOIA discovery.  


I can say from personal experience that identical or similar FOIA requests to inter-related agencies at different levels (local, state and federal) will occasionally reveal false or misleading information or omissions in the communications between agencies.


Also, if you suspect and want certified proof that an agency doesn't have a particular record that it might be expected to have, make a FOIA request in order to get written confirmation that the record doesn't exist.

Persistence pays off.  If necessary, there are non-profit, public service organizations that will help you.  At the national level, for example, try the Sunlight Foundation or the Center for Investigative Reporting.

Thursday, December 4, 2014

OCWRC Denies FOIA Request (No Such Documents); Appeal

[The Oakland County Water Resources Commissioner's FOIA Coordinator denied my request for certain records having to do with construction site silt runoff (nearly identical to the one posted here November 21, 2014).  The following is my appeal of that denial.  

Bear in mind, however, that the main point is that there can be no rational justification for the double standard of erosion control enforcement being practiced in Oakland County municipalities.]

***   ***   ***

WR Commissioner Nash:

By letter via U.S. Postal Service dated December 2, 2014, your FOIA Coordinator...denied my FOIA request for certain records* with the statement that "The documents understood to be requested either do not exist or are not maintained by the Oakland County Water Resources Commissioner's office.  Therefore, your request for public documents...is denied."

Sorry to put so fine a point on it, but I requested records, not merely documents.  This is my appeal.

The FOIA statute begins, "AN ACT to provide for public access to certain public records of public bodies; to permit certain fees; to prescribe the powers and duties of certain public officers and public bodies; to provide remedies and penalties; and to repeal certain acts and parts of acts."  The statute further provides: 

15.232 Definitions.

(e) “Public record” means a writing prepared, owned, used, in the possession of, or retained by a public body in the performance of an official function, from the time it is created. Public record does not include computer software...

(h) “Writing” means handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, photocopying, and every other means of recording, and includes letters, words, pictures, sounds, or symbols, or combinations thereof, and papers, maps, magnetic or paper tapes, photographic films or prints, microfilm, microfiche, magnetic or punched cards, discs, drums, or other means of recording or retaining meaningful content.

The Michigan Attorney General wrote,
(p.5) "It does not matter what form the record is in." 

For example (p.44):

Oakland County Treasurer v Title Office, Inc, 245 Mich App 196; 627 NW2d 317 (2001).

"Electronic records are writings as defined by the FOIA. Public bodies are required to provide public records in the format requested. If there is no explicit statutory language that provides fees for electronic records, the records must be provided using the FOIA fee requirements." 

I believe video and audio recordings are accessible as well.

Please grant my appeal, reverse the determination of your FOIA Coordinator and furnish me with copies of the requested records.

-- Jim Lang
(address and phone)

* Summarized as "...a copy of all records created or obtained by OCWRC within the timeframe of January 1, 2014 to present that contain a rationale for the difference between the strict water quality and erosion control enforcement in MEAs and the lax enforcement by OCWRC in its role as CEA, as that rationale relates to Michigan waters and the public trust." (See your file for the complete request.)