Showing posts with label public health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public health. Show all posts

Thursday, April 21, 2016

‘Pure Michigan’ Implies Clean Water

The State of Michigan’s tourism ad campaign, ‘Pure Michigan,’ implies (among other things) clean water. It is an illusion, but a widely accepted illusion, especially outside Michigan where it has attracted visitors. The ad campaign doesn't mention frequent beach closings or the PCB- and mercury-laced fish, but tourists have seemed willing to overlook such shortcomings.




Nevertheless, you can only push your luck so far. What had been a catchy phrase and a phenomenal success in promoting tourism, ‘Pure Michigan’ became diluted and cheapened when a political cabal in Lansing started renting out the phrase to the likes of Kroger.


Steadily over recent years, the very concept that suggested a clean, healthy and pleasant locale to visit was undermined and ultimately trashed by a cadre of exploiters and abusers, unrelenting in their quest for lower business taxes and less government, including less environmental regulation.  


They put greed and special interests ahead of public health and a clean environment.


The Flint water debacle is the most recent example. Administrators from the Michigan Department of Agriculture (having been given a tail, “...and Rural Development”) or MDARD were put in charge of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), obviously to deflect enforcement action away from agricultural polluters, particularly the big factory farms that have appeared in the past decade or two.


Other departures from the purity proclaimed in the tourism ads are plain. Instead of improving the suffocating, chemical-laden air in southeast Detroit, the Lansing cabal was smiling on plans to increase toxic emissions from a steel plant and an oil refinery, prior to the disaster in Flint.


Ancient, corroding pipelines throughout the state have gone uninspected; or have been inspected, found to be deficient and then ignored. Under the Granholm Administration, one such line ruptured, polluting wetlands, tributaries and the Kalamazoo River itself.


In 2014, either reckless, inattentive permitting or wink-and-a-nod permitting on the part of MDEQ concerning a huge construction site near East Grand Traverse Bay resulted in sediment clouding the bay and threatening pristine aquatic habitat after rain. MDEQ had allowed the construction contractor to strip the vegetation off 160 acres all at once.


Citizen reports of excessive pathogens and nutrients running off industrial-scale livestock feeding operations, supported by water samples, have been routinely ignored by MDEQ, which pleads lack of staff and budget, following reductions required by the governor and colleagues in the legislature.


In 2011, false reports concerning court-ordered sewage sludge production at the Detroit wastewater treatment plant, bearing upon pollution of the Detroit River and Lake Erie, went undiscovered by MDEQ, although an amateur (this writer) could find them.


Health risks associated with toxins and pathogens in Michigan’s numerous, polluted Areas of Concern are marginalized in MDEQ’s rush to be rid of the stigma that inhibits profit.

So much for ‘Pure Michigan.’

Saturday, April 2, 2016

MDEQ Says GLWA Layoffs Violated Agreement



Excerpts from an Oakland Press article by Ronald Seigel, 4-1-16:

Image result for detroit sewer department workers protest
voiceofdetroit.net

The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality sent a notice March 9 to both the Detroit Water and Sewage Department and the newly formed Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA) serving the suburbs, that employee layoffs made in the Detroit Water System last October violated state environmental laws and a consent agreement made several years ago. [Emphasis added.]
 The State MDEQ stated these layoffs violated an administrative consent order between that state agency, and the Detroit Water and Sewage Department and agreed to by the newly formed GLWA, which took charge of suburban water at the start this year. MDEQ stated the agreement required at least 95 percent of the minimum staffing level of the MDEQ’s approved staffing plan “on an average annual basis,” but after the layoffs the staffing level went down to 85 percent.
[GLWA Director Susan] McCormick stated that many or most of the functions of the laid off employees will be replaced by new hires and internal transfers.

GLWA Counsel William Wolfson said because the consent agreement requiring GLWA to have 95 percent of the minimum staffing level specified, that this would be done on an “annual average basis.”


Do MDEQ’s sudden concerns about staffing at GLWA and the obvious bearing staffing has on public health and safety reflect a new vigilance at MDEQ? If so, we can expect a lot more actions like this one.

Consider the past inattention to Michigan’s numerous impaired waters, in addition to the glacial pace of restoring Michigan’s toxic Areas of Concern, not to mention the disgraceful pollution caused by turning a blind eye to the discharged manure of hundreds of thousands of animals in Michigan’s industrial-scale livestock feeding operations.

Or does laissez faire continue to reign supreme in those arenas? Time will tell.

Thursday, November 5, 2015

The Murky Waters of USACE Dredging



USACE photo - Mouth of the Clinton River on Lake St. Clair

  -- the first in a series --

Every few years, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE or the Corps) arranges to dredge channels in the mouths of rivers entering international waters in southeast Michigan to remove accumulated sediments that interfere with navigation.

Two examples are the Clinton River and the River Rouge.

Over several months in 2009-2010, a Corps contractor removed 17,454 cubic yards of sediment from the mouth of the Clinton River, generally to a depth of eight feet, at a cost of $338,413.

In August 2012, the River Rouge navigation channel was dredged to a depth of 21 feet.  It cost $363,886 to remove 39,951 cubic yards.  

In both instances, the dredgings were deposited in confined (land-based) disposal facilities.

The Clinton and Rouge dredging projects are dwarfed by those in Cleveland and Toledo, but all are subject to similar conflicts between commercial, public health and environmental interests.  

Many such projects are affected by Corps machinations to utilize open-water (lake) dumping of dredged sediments, instead of confined or land-based disposal.  Open-water disposal is simpler, faster and cheaper (cheaper if you disregard the environmental consequences and risks to public health).

    Cleveland      

When sediment contains toxins and other pollutants, the question of how best to dispose of the contaminated dredgings arises.

Public concerns have re-emerged this past year in Cleveland and Toledo about dumping contaminated sediments from river channels into Lake Erie.

In Cleveland, the Corps proposed to dredge the six-mile Cuyahoga River navigation channel and dump the dredged sediments in the lake.

The State of Ohio objected to open-lake disposal because the sediments, especially in the last mile upstream, were heavily contaminated with toxins, including polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB), from steel production years before.  The state maintained that open-lake dumping would create a public health hazard.

Although Congress had authorized enough money for confined (on-land) disposal, USACE insisted that some other party, apparently meaning the State of Ohio, pay for the more expensive confined disposal of sediments dredged from the sixth mile upstream.  

Ohio refused and sought relief in federal court.  This past May, the judge agreed with the state, ordering the Corps to dredge the six-mile channel, place all of the sediment in a confined disposal site and absorb the cost.

USACE may be down but it’s not out.  It has at least one more trick up its sleeve to re-establish open-water dumping, if not off Cleveland, then perhaps everywhere else.

*****

Next in this series, we’ll look at Toledo, the 900 pound gorilla in the zoo of Great Lakes dredging.

The series will conclude with an analysis of a Corps “experiment,” the underwater equivalent of a Rube Goldberg contraption.  Junk science at its best!

*****     *****     *****